Arslanoglu and Kurutkan’s (2025) bibliometric study offers a comprehensive examination of how social risk conditions—such as deprivation, poverty, inequality and low socioeconomic status—shape the landscape of research on pediatric type 1 diabetes. Drawing on the Web of Science database, the authors identified 284 English-language articles published between 2001 and 2023 that directly address these social determinants in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
The analysis began with a rigorous two-stage screening process. First, 469 records were retrieved using broad keywords related to social risk and pediatric diabetes; then abstracts and titles were reviewed by subject-matter experts to confirm relevance. Performance metrics revealed an annual growth rate of 13.1 percent in publications, with an average of 18.6 citations per document, underscoring both the expanding interest in this field and the significant impact of its findings.
Co-citation analysis distilled three principal thematic clusters. The first cluster, “Management and Clinical Outcomes of Type 1 Diabetes,” highlights research on how access to insulin therapies and glucose-monitoring technologies differs by economic status. The second cluster, “Deprivation and Socioeconomic Determinants,” emphasizes studies linking low socioeconomic conditions with poorer glycemic control, increased complication rates, and elevated parental stress. The third cluster, “Cumulative Effects of Socioeconomic and Cultural Factors,” integrates the roles of ethnicity, family structure and health policy in shaping long-term outcomes.
Complementing this, keyword co-occurrence mapping revealed seven thematic areas: the epidemiology of childhood diabetes; quality of life; technological and insurance-based interventions; pediatric health services; insulin administration and monitoring strategies; and the influence of health policies. Notably, “Pediatric Diabetes” emerged as the most prolific journal, while authors such as Holl RW and institutions like the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus led in publication count. International collaboration was moderate (17.9 percent), with countries like Ireland and Denmark exhibiting particularly high multi-country publication rates.
From a policy perspective, these findings underscore the urgent need for more inclusive strategies targeted at socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. The persistent gaps in access to modern diabetes technologies and variable incorporation of social determinants into routine clinical care suggest that policy makers and healthcare providers must prioritize equitable resource allocation. Integrating social service specialists into pediatric diabetes teams, as recommended by ISPAD guidelines, could be a tangible first step toward closing these gaps.
In conclusion, the bibliometric patterns identified by Arslanoglu and Kurutkan (2025) highlight both the progress and the persistent challenges in understanding the interplay between social risk conditions and pediatric type 1 diabetes. Future research should explore targeted interventions to mitigate socioeconomic disparities, evaluate the impact of subsidizing advanced diabetes technologies for low-income families, and develop robust data-collection frameworks that routinely capture patients’ social contexts.
Reference
Arslanoglu, I., & Kurutkan, M. N. (2025). The effects of social risk conditions on pediatric type 1 diabetes in terms of bibliometric analysis. Konuralp Medical Journal, 17(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1430130
Podcast link: https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/d69a1be1-1985-49ef-a1a4-b94252cd72ce/audio