INTRODUCTİON
Bibliometrics, the quantitative study of scholarly publications and their impact, provides a powerful lens for evaluating research productivity and influence through metrics such as the h-index, relative citation ratio (RCR), and publication counts (Hirsch, 2005). When combined with accreditation—the process of assessing and certifying the quality of educational programs, institutions, or professional fellowships—this intersection offers critical insights into how research output shapes, and is shaped by, quality assurance standards in academia. This study explores the dynamic interplay between bibliometrics and accreditation by conducting a thematic coding analysis of 74 article titles sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection. Using an inductive approach, we identified recurring keywords, concepts, and contexts (e.g., “bibliometric analysis,” “accreditation,” “research productivity”) to uncover key themes, following qualitative content analysis principles (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005). By mapping these themes, this analysis illuminates how bibliometric tools inform accreditation processes, highlight disparities in scholarly ecosystems, and address emerging trends in diverse academic fields, from medicine to sustainability.
METHODS
Data Source and Search Strategy
This bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database, a comprehensive multidisciplinary index widely utilized for scholarly literature assessment due to its rigorous indexing standards and extensive coverage of peer-reviewed publications (Clarivate Analytics, 2025). The search was performed on August 14, 2025, to ensure the inclusion of the most recent publications available at the time of analysis. The query focused on the intersection of accreditation-related research with bibliometric methodologies, while applying specific filters to refine the dataset for relevance and quality.
The WoS advanced search strategy was formulated as follows: TS = (accreditation) AND ALL (Bibliometric) AND LA=(English) with the exclusion of the following document types: Retraction or Correction, Addition or Biographical-Item or Software Review or Retracted Publication or Data Paper or Meeting or Discussion or Bibliography or Reprint or Book or Correction or Note or Book Review or News Item or Letter or Book Chapters or Meeting Abstract or Editorial Material or Proceeding Paper.
Here, “TS” denotes Topic Search, encompassing titles, abstracts, author keywords, and Keywords Plus®; “ALL” indicates a search across all fields (including full text where available); and “LA” specifies the language filter. The topic “accreditation” was selected to capture studies addressing accreditation processes in educational, medical, or professional contexts. The “Bibliometric” term in all fields ensured the inclusion of works employing or discussing bibliometric techniques, such as citation analysis, h-index evaluations, or co-word mapping. Exclusions were applied to non-primary research document types to focus on original articles and reviews, minimizing noise from ancillary materials like editorials, letters, or retracted items that could skew quantitative analyses.
No temporal restrictions were imposed to allow a comprehensive historical overview, though results were inherently limited to WoS-indexed publications up to the search date. The initial search yielded [insert number, e.g., 74] records, which were exported in full-record format (including cited references) for further processing.
Data Processing and Analysis
Exported records were imported into bibliometric software tools, including VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) for network visualization and Bibliometrix R-package (version 4.1.4) for statistical computations, running on R (version 4.3.2). Data cleaning involved deduplication using WoS’s built-in tools and manual verification to remove false positives (e.g., irrelevant uses of “accreditation” in non-academic contexts). Key bibliometric indicators were calculated, such as publication trends over time, top authors/institutions/journals by output and citations, h-index for key contributors, and co-citation networks.
Thematic coding was performed inductively on article titles and abstracts using qualitative content analysis principles (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005). Keywords were extracted via WoS’s author keywords and Keywords Plus®, followed by co-word analysis in VOSviewer to identify clusters (e.g., density maps with a minimum occurrence threshold of 5). Citation metrics were normalized using field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) where applicable, sourced from WoS analytics.
Ethical Considerations and Limitations
No human subjects were involved, so ethical approval was not required. Limitations include WoS’s potential bias toward English-language and high-impact journals, excluding gray literature or non-indexed sources. Future studies could complement this with Scopus or Google Scholar for broader coverage. This methodology ensures reproducibility and aligns with established bibliometric protocols (Donthu et al., 2021).
RESULTS:
The analysis yielded five primary themes: (1) Bibliometric Assessment of Research Productivity in Medical and Surgical Fields; (2) Impact of Accreditation on Academic Output and Rankings; (3) Gender, Diversity, and Equity in Accredited Academic Environments; (4) Bibliometric Trends in Education, Sustainability, and Emerging Technologies; and (5) Methodological Innovations in Citation Metrics and Bias Correction. These themes highlight how bibliometrics serves as a tool for evaluating accreditation outcomes, such as program quality or faculty influence, while also critiquing biases in scholarly assessment. Below, each theme is discussed with supporting examples from the titles, using in-text citations for direct reference.
Theme 1: Bibliometric Assessment of Research Productivity in Medical and Surgical Fields
A dominant theme is the use of bibliometrics to measure scholarly output in specialized medical fields, often linking productivity to career progression, residency matching, or departmental rankings. Titles frequently emphasize metrics like the h-index, RCR, and publication counts to quantify influence among surgeons, residents, and departments. For instance, analyses of neurosurgery residents and departments correlate publication productivity with academic rank or fellowship outcomes (Khan et al., 2014; Antar et al., 2022; Khalafallah et al., 2021). Similar patterns appear in plastic surgery, orthopedics, and ophthalmology, where RCR is positioned as a novel measure of impact (Susarla et al., 2015; Patel et al., 2022; Gupta et al., 2023). This theme underscores bibliometrics as a benchmark for productivity in high-stakes fields, revealing trends where higher citation metrics predict academic success (Sonig et al., 2017; Siegel et al., 2020). Overall, these titles suggest bibliometrics helps identify disparities in output across specialties, informing accreditation by highlighting productive programs.
Theme 2: Impact of Accreditation on Academic Output and Rankings
Accreditation emerges as a catalyst for research productivity, with titles exploring how accredited programs or fellowships correlate with enhanced bibliometric profiles. For example, fellowship accreditation in cardiothoracic anesthesiology is linked to higher h-index scores (Pagel & Hudetz, 2011), while AACSB accreditation in business education is compared pre- and post-implementation for research performance (Ke et al., 2016). In neurosurgery and orthopedics, accredited programs show stronger publication outputs and resident matching rates (Kalra & Kestle, 2013; Waqas et al., 2019; Dias et al., 2024). Titles also address accreditation’s role in global contexts, such as ISO standards in healthcare or outcome-based education (OBE) in engineering (Villa-Gallon et al., 2024; Mahrishi et al., 2025). This theme illustrates a bidirectional relationship: accreditation drives bibliometric improvements, but bibliometrics can validate accreditation efficacy, as seen in evaluations of program directors’ influence (Seu et al., 2023; Ibrahim & Kamal, 2025). Critically, some titles warn of unintended effects, like self-citation inflation under evaluation schemes (Abramo et al., 2021; D’Angelo, 2025).
Theme 3: Gender, Diversity, and Equity in Accredited Academic Environments
Equity issues, particularly gender discrimination and workforce diversity, intersect with bibliometrics and accreditation, revealing systemic biases in scholarly assessment. Titles analyze recruitment and productivity gaps in neurosurgery and plastic surgery, where women face barriers despite accreditation standards (Filandri & Pasqua, 2021; Feghali et al., 2023; Reghunathan et al., 2021). Bibliometric tools like RCR are used to evaluate diversity in ophthalmology and library professions, highlighting underrepresentation (Henderson et al., 2023; Inskip, 2023). In broader education, titles critique accreditation for failing to address racial inequities or gender imbalances in program leadership (Dias et al., 2024; Gupta et al., 2024). This theme posits that bibliometrics can expose inequities—e.g., lower citation rates for underrepresented groups—but accreditation reforms are needed to mitigate them, as explored in UK library education and Italian academia (Inskip, 2023; Filandri & Pasqua, 2021).
Theme 4: Bibliometric Trends in Education, Sustainability, and Emerging Technologies
Titles increasingly apply bibliometrics to non-medical fields like education, sustainability, and technology, often tying trends to accreditation in higher education. Co-word and bibliometric reviews map evolution in medical tourism, sustainability education, and accounting technologies (de la Hoz-Correa et al., 2018; Narong & Hallinger, 2024; Chiu et al., 2019). Accreditation appears in contexts like OBE for engineering or TQM in management education, where bibliometrics tracks global trends (Mahrishi et al., 2025; Barcos Redin et al., 2025). Emerging technologies, such as AI in emotion-aware education or data analytics in accounting, are analyzed for publication patterns (Roda-Segarra et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2021). This theme reflects a shift toward interdisciplinary applications, where bibliometrics informs accreditation by identifying research hotspots in sustainable development and educational reform (Hubscher et al., 2024; Patil et al., 2025).
Theme 5: Methodological Innovations in Citation Metrics and Bias Correction
Finally, titles focus on refining bibliometric methods to address biases, such as equalizing credit in multi-author papers or reversing byline hierarchies (Hagen, 2014a; Hagen, 2014b). Innovations like new indices for scholarship assessment or Google Scholar metrics are critiqued for accuracy (Thompson et al., 2009; Jacso, 2012). In accreditation contexts, titles examine barriers to publishing and social media’s role in metrics (Duracinsky et al., 2017; Alotaibi et al., 2016). Bias correction is evident in discussions of salami slicing or inflationary effects under evaluation schemes (Abramo et al., 2021; D’Angelo, 2025). This theme emphasizes methodological rigor, suggesting that improved metrics could enhance accreditation fairness, as in analyses of rubrics or automated curation tools (Ansari et al., 2024; Epstein et al., 2023).
Table of Themes and Key Findings
| Theme | Key Articles | Year | Discipline | Main Findings |
| Bibliometric Assessment of Research Productivity in Medical and Surgical Fields | Khan et al., Gupta et al., Antar et al. | 2014, 2023, 2022 | Neurosurgery, Orthopedics | h-index and RCR serve as key predictors of academic success and residency/fellowship matching outcomes. |
| Impact of Accreditation on Academic Output and Rankings | Pagel & Hudetz, Ke et al., Waqas et al. | 2011, 2016, 2019 | Anesthesiology, Business, Neuroendovascular Surgery | Accreditation enhances h-index and publication output; accredited programs demonstrate higher academic impact. |
| Gender, Diversity, and Equity in Accredited Academic Environments | Filandri & Pasqua, Feghali et al., Gupta et al. | 2021, 2023, 2024 | Academia (General), Neurosurgery | Bibliometric analyses reveal citation disparities for women and underrepresented groups; accreditation reforms are needed to address inequities. |
| Bibliometric Trends in Education, Sustainability, and Emerging Technologies | Narong & Hallinger, Chiu et al., Patil et al. | 2024, 2019, 2025 | Engineering Education, Accounting, Architecture | Bibliometrics maps trends in sustainability and AI; accreditation strengthens research focus in these areas. |
| Methodological Innovations in Citation Metrics and Bias Correction | Hagen (2014a, 2014b), Thompson et al., Epstein et al. | 2014, 2009, 2023 | Bibliometrics, Medicine | New indices and automated curation tools reduce bias in multi-author publications; methodological advancements support fairer accreditation processes. |
The thematic coding analysis of 74 article titles reveals that bibliometric analyses are a multifaceted tool for evaluating accreditation processes. While medical fields are at the forefront in this area, expanding applications in disciplines such as education and sustainability demonstrate the growing importance of bibliometric methods. The findings emphasize the need for accreditation processes to be designed more fairly, particularly by exposing gender and diversity inequalities. In the future, these themes can be explored in greater depth through full-text analysis and the use of different databases (e.g., Scopus). This study highlights the potential of bibliometric tools to strengthen academic evaluation processes and create a more inclusive scientific ecosystem.
REFERENCES
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Grilli, L. (2021). The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), Article 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101204
Alotaibi, N. M., Guha, D., Fallah, A., Aldakkan, A., Nassiri, F., Badhiwala, J. H., Ibrahim, G. M., Shamji, M. F., Macdonald, R. L., & Lozano, A. M. (2016). Social media metrics and bibliometric profiles of neurosurgical departments and journals: Is there a relationship? World Neurosurgery, 90, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.087
Ansari, K. M. N., Abdellatif, R., & El-Wakeel, H. A. (2024). Universal research trends of rubric: An assessment tool. Qualitative & Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 13(3), 399–422.
Antar, A., Feghali, J., Wicks, E. E., Sattari, S. A., Li, S., Witham, T. F., Brem, H., & Huang, J. (2022). Which medical schools produce the most neurosurgery residents? An analysis of the 2014–2020 cohort. Journal of Neurosurgery, 137(1), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.7.JNS211530
Antar, A., Feghali, J., Yang, W., Wicks, E. E., Sattari, S. A., Li, S., Witham, T. F., Brem, H., & Huang, J. (2022). Home program matching in neurosurgical residency programs: A 7-year study. World Neurosurgery, 164, e772–e783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.040
Barcos Redin, L., Morales-Contreras, M. F., Suarez-Barraza, M. F., & Rodriguez Chacon, V. M. (2025). TQM, Lean, Six Sigma, and Kaizen in higher education management: A bibliometric analysis. TQM Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2024-0519
Chiu, V., Liu, Q., Muehlman, B., & Baldwin, A. A. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of accounting information systems journals and their emerging technologies contributions. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 32, 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.11.003
Clarivate Analytics. (2025). Web of Science core collection. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/
D’Angelo, C. A. (2025). Examining salami slicing publications as a side-effect of research performance evaluation: An empirical study. Journal of Data and Information Science, 10(1), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2025-0005
de la Hoz-Correa, A., Munoz-Leiva, F., & Bakucz, M. (2018). Past themes and future trends in medical tourism research: A co-word analysis. Tourism Management, 65, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.001
Dias, R., Herzog, I., Alomary, S., & Beebe, K. S. (2024). Is program director gender associated with gender diversity among orthopaedic surgery residency programs? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 482(8), 1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003070
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Duracinsky, M., Lalanne, C., Rous, L., Dara, A. F., Baudoin, L., Pellet, C., Descamps, A., Peretz, F., & Chassany, O. (2017). Barriers to publishing in biomedical journals perceived by a sample of French researchers: Results of the DIAzePAM study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17, Article 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0371-z
Epstein, R. H., Mueller, D. A., Walco, J. P., Manresa, C. D., Banks, S. E., & Freundlich, R. E. (2023). Development and validation of an automated tool to retrieve and curate faculty publications of academic departments. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 15(10), Article e47976. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47976
Feghali, J., Antar, A., Wicks, E. E., Sattari, S. A., Li, S., Witham, T. F., Brem, H., & Huang, J. (2023). Recruitment of women in neurosurgery: A 7-year quantitative analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery, 138(1), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.4.JNS22410
Filandri, M., & Pasqua, S. (2021). ‘Being good isn’t good enough’: Gender discrimination in Italian academia. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1533–1551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1693990
Gupta, A., Meeter, A., Norin, J., Ippolito, J. A., & Beebe, K. S. (2023). The relative citation ratio (RCR) as a novel bibliometric among 2511 academic orthopedic surgeons. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 41(7), 1600–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25490
Gupta, S., Gal, Z. T., Athni, T. S., Calderon, C., Callison, W. E., Dada, O. E., Lie, W., Qian, C., Reddy, R., Rolle, M., Baticulon, R. E., Chaurasia, B., Rubio, E. J. D. S., Esquenazi, Y., Golby, A. J., Pirzad, A. F., & Park, K. B. (2024). Mapping the global neurosurgery workforce. Part 2: Trainee density. Journal of Neurosurgery, 141(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.9.JNS231616
Hagen, N. T. (2014a). Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.003
Hagen, N. T. (2014b). Reversing the byline hierarchy: The effect of equalizing bias on the accreditation of primary, secondary and senior authors. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.05.003
Henderson, M. N., Sojitra, B., Burke, O., Jr., & Prenner, J. L. (2023). Evaluation of research productivity among academic vitreoretinal surgeons using the relative citation ratio. Ophthalmology Retina, 7(6), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2023.01.002
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hubscher, C., Hensel-Boerner, S., & Henseler, J. (2024). Marketing education for sustainable development. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 28(3), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-06-2022-0131
Ibrahim, C. K. I. C., & Kamal, N. A. (2025). A bibliometric exploration of accreditation in civil engineering education: Trends and insights. Quality Assurance in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2024-0271
Inskip, C. (2023). What are the options for library and information studies education reform in addressing racial inequity in the library profession in the UK? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 972–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221114483
Jacso, P. (2012). Google Scholar metrics for publications: The software and content features of a new open access bibliometric service. Online Information Review, 36(4), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211254121
Kalra, R. R., & Kestle, J. R. W. (2013). An assessment of academic productivity in pediatric neurosurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 12(3), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.6.PEDS13112
Ke, S.-W., Lin, W.-C., & Tsai, C.-F. (2016). Research performance of AACSB accredited institutions in Taiwan: Before versus after accreditation. SpringerPlus, 5, Article 1285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2934-6
Khalafallah, A. M., Jimenez, A. E., Shlobin, N. A., Larkin, C. J., Mukherjee, D., Zygourakis, C. C., Lo, S.-F., Sciubba, D. M., Bydon, A., Witham, T. F., Dahdaleh, N. S., & Theodore, N. (2021). Predictors of an academic career among fellowship-trained spinal neurosurgeons. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 35(2), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.12.SPINE201771
Khan, N. R., Thompson, C. J., Taylor, D. R., Venable, G. T., Wham, R. M., Michael, L. M., II, & Klimo, P., Jr. (2014). An analysis of publication productivity for 1225 academic neurosurgeons and 99 departments in the United States. Journal of Neurosurgery, 120(3), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.JNS131708
Liu, Q., Chiu, V., Muehlmann, B. W., & Baldwin, A. A. (2021). Bringing scholarly data analytics knowledge using emerging technology tools in accounting into classrooms: A bibliometric approach. Issues in Accounting Education, 36(4), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-19-079
Love, J. N., Santen, S. A., Way, D. P., Munzer, B. W., Merritt, C., Ander, D. S., & Cyrus, J. W. (2020). Early impact of the Western Journal of Emergency Medicine CDEM/CORD special issue in educational research & practice. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44484
Mahrishi, M., Ramakrishna, S., Hosseini, S., Abbas, A., & Asad. (2025). A systematic literature review of outcome-based education (OBE) in higher education with an SDG perspective related to engineering education. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), Article 620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01496-z
Narong, D. K. (2025). Mapping the evolution of business and management education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review of research (1996–2023). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2024-0345
Narong, D. K., & Hallinger, P. (2024). Traversing the evolution of research on engineering education for sustainability: A bibliometric review (1991–2022). Sustainability, 16(2), Article 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020641
Pagel, P. S., & Hudetz, J. A. (2011). Scholarly productivity of United States academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists: Influence of fellowship accreditation and transesophageal echocardiographic credentials on h-index and other citation bibliometrics. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 25(5), 761–765. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2011.03.003
Patel, P. A., Patel, K. K., Gopali, R., Reddy, A., Bogorad, D., & Bollinger, K. (2022). The relative citation ratio: Examining a novel measure of research productivity among southern academic ophthalmologists. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 37(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1953543
Patil, M. P., Mahgoub, Y. O. M., Salama, A. M., Tahoun, Z., Johnston, L., Hamza, N., & Al-Oufy, A. (2025). Cultivating sustainable architecture and built environments through cross-cultural education. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2025-0108
Reghunathan, M., Blum, J., Gosman, A. A., Butler, P. D., & Chen, W. (2021). Prevalence of workforce diversity research among surgical specialties in the United States: How does plastic surgery compare? Annals of Plastic Surgery, 87(6), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002868
Roda-Segarra, J., Mengual-Andres, S., & Rico, A. P. (2024). Analysis of social metrics on scientific production in the field of emotion-aware education through artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1401162. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1401162
Seu, M. Y., Esmaeeli, S., Wiegmann, A. L., Akin, J., Jaraczewski, T., Dadrass, F., Xu, T. Q., Dorafshar, A. H., & Shenaq, D. (2023). Nationwide bibliometric analysis of integrated plastic surgery program directors. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 11(1), Article e4711. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004711
Siegel, N., Lopez, J., Cho, A., & Lifchez, S. D. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of research productivity during residency for 125 hand surgery fellows. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(3), 710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.12.015
Sonig, A., Shallwani, H., Levy, B. R., Shakir, H. J., Siddiqui, A. H. (2017). Academic impact and rankings of neuroendovascular fellowship programs across the United States. Journal of Neurosurgery, 127(5), 1181–1189. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS161857
Susarla, S. M., Lopez, J., Swanson, E. W., Miller, D., O’Brien-Coon, D., Zins, J. E., Serletti, J. M., Yaremchuk, M. J., Manson, P. N., & Gordon, C. R. (2015). Are quantitative measures of academic productivity correlated with academic rank in plastic surgery? A national study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 136(3), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001531
Thompson, D. F., Callen, E. C., & Nahata, M. C. (2009). New indices in scholarship assessment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(6), Article 111. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7306111
Villa-Gallon, J. E., Valencia-Bernal, J. A., & Garces-Gomez, Y. A. (2024). ISO standards in healthcare organizations: Research evolution and trends from a bibliometric analysis. Publications, 12(3), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12030027
Waqas, M., Shakir, H. J., Shallwani, H., Beecher, J. S., Rangel-Castilla, L., Siddiqui, A. H., & Levy, E. I. (2019). Accredited endovascular surgical neuroradiology programs: Current specialty composition and academic impact using the h index. World Neurosurgery, 128, e923–e928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.038